APPEAL TO THE INDEPENDENT POLICE COMPLAINT’S COMMISSION (‘IPCC’)
Submissions to IPCC in respect of Appeal Relating to the Police Response dated 24th March 2016 to The Complaint of Ella Gareeva dated 15th May 2015 Police ref: PC 5920 / 14 [Ms Draper] IPCC Reference: 2015/047905
We act for Ella Gareeva, aka Ella Draper in the aforementioned matter.
This document is a response to the police report dated 24th March 2016 (the “police report”).
On 4/5th September 2014, the children of Ella Gareeva, A and G, made allegations of horrific sexual abuse, murder and cannibalism of babies by a “cult” mainly operating from the Hampstead area. The suspects include their father Mr. Ricky Dearman, teaching staff and other members of Christchurch primary school and other local schools, parents of other children attending these schools, members of the police, social services and other professionals.
HAMPSTEAD COVER UP, ORIGINAL CHILDREN'S TESTIMONIES
The investigation into these allegations was concluded on 22nd September 2014 with “no crime confirmed”.
Subject:CRIMINALS WITH NO LAWFUL AUTHORITY WHATSOEVER
You have failed to arrest judge Anna Pauffley, who has committed FRAUD and TREASON by aiding and abetting the cover-up of child-rape, torture and murder - despite the FACT you possess irrefutable DOCUMENTED PROOF that Pauffley has committed these crimes. You have thus demonstrated that you are not prepared to uphold the law of this land in certain cases which involve members of the judiciary - or your own police colleagues & “superior” officers. Such prejudice and partiality - evidently standard police policy - shows that you are not only unfit to serve the people, but it is also PROOF of your complicity in Anna Pauffley’s crimes.
YOU are aiding and abetting FRAUD and TREASON, and the cover-up of child-rape, torture and murder. You are nothing but common criminals. The proliferation of your kind among the police has led to the situation where not only the police, judiciary and Parliament are infested with child-rapists/murderers, but so too are many other institutions of public trust, including local authorities and even schools. Since it is impossible to distinguish who’s who, it is now essential - for safety’s sake - to regard ANYONE wearing a police uniform, or calling themselves a police officer, as a potentially dangerous criminal, and possible threat to life. Furthermore: ALL UK Police forces and Courts are, IN FACT, corporations and profit-prioritising businesses which enforce corporate policy for their criminal owners (a KaBaal of assorted bankers, royals, so-called aristocrats, etc.). Law-abiding people - LIVING children, women and men - can have NO LAWFUL CONTRACT with a criminal corporate police or judiciary. AS OF NOW, all UK police forces and Courts have NO LAWFUL AUTHORITY WHATSOEVER over any living child, woman or man. Attempts by any “police officer” or Court official to enforce their FAKE authority over law-abiding people is now a CRIME. All functionaries of the utterly corrupt UK State, have NO authority or say over the lives and well-being of any child, woman or man. And to you COWARDS who were too frightened to do anything about your criminal colleagues: NOW is the time to GET OUT OF THE WAY before it’s too late. Nothing now can prevent what is coming. TORTURE, RAPE AND MURDER OF INNOCENTS ARE NOT TOLERATED BY LAW - AND YOU ARE NOW TO PAY THE PRICE FOR IGNORING THE LAW.
from the living man and conscious living being known as,
Subject:Reporting of Anna Pauffley to Met/UK Police for Fraud, Perverting the Course of Justice & Treason, 30 March, 2016
To the policemen and policewomen of The Metropolitan Police and the other UK Police Forces addressed in this email, as well as to those witnesses - particularly the members of the press - CC’d in this email:
I, Drifloud, am reporting the very serious crimes of fraud, perverting the course of justice and the betrayal of the people of this land - TREASON – which have been committed by Anna Pauffley, a High Court Judge.
NOTE: This is NOT a “complaint” and I am NOT a “complainant”; this is a fulfilment of my LAWFUL OBLIGATION - as a living man - to report a crime to those whose LAWFUL DUTY it is - as PUBLIC SERVANTS - to investigate ALL known and/or reported crimes
Special Constable Jean Clement Yaohirou gave evidence in Court, under oath, at a so-called “fact-finding” hearing in the Royal Courts of Justice, Tuesday 17th February 2015. SC Yaohirou was initially questioned by the presiding judge, Anna Pauffley, regarding the mobile phone recording he made on the evening of 4th September 2014. That recording contained testimony/evidence of two children, alisa and gabriel, their mother ella gareeva (formerly Draper) and Yaohirou’s brother-in-law abraham christie. This recording has been made public and can be listened to in its entirety:
These are the police interviews conducted with Gabriel Gareev (Dearman) after videos were submitted with the testimony of Gabriel and his sister Alisa in September 2014. The police investigation was a farce and the kids were stolen from their parents and put in foster care to keep them silent for the rest of their lives. I will claim that this is the biggest case of the 21st century and yet the best kept secret in the 21st century. You need to learn about it!
I added still-frame grabs to the questions and answers as I believe the non-verbal stuff often says far more than the words and often contradict the words, too. As well, its often easier to quote with a picture and words than to just describe or to post a video clip. Its all about quality, right? The message has to get out in the best form as possible and as many forms as possible.
I want to make an important point here.
*** 1st Interview Sep. 5, 2014
Gabriel Police interviews
Tell you who we are. My names Steve. I’m a policeman and I work at this police station. Cleo is the controller.
>>Note that there are only two officers present and no social services people. This will change at the 2nd interview. Don’t forget it!<<
Gabe knows what a police controller is, he says.
In comparing all 3 interviews, my opinion is that both Gabriel and Alisa were unsure and rather reserved about the whole thing. I do not think they had confidence in the system and process. They knew there were police in on cult activities and social services (CAFCASS) as well. But they were going along with their parents.
These 1st 4 are from the 1st minute of the interview. I think these show that apprehension and doubt. Gabriel will be much more relaxed and at ease in the 2nd interview.
The history of marijuana and hemp prohibition is a dark and shady story with all the makings of a diabolical thriller. In a dystopian world, shady oligarchs institute prohibition in order to benefit their institutions in the short term, leading to the inception of a police state in which sustainable agriculture is ridiculed, shamanic medicine is scorned, and generations are forced into punitive situations as a result of the plant’s contraband status.
Now, I don’t normally dwell in the “what-if’s” and rarely speculate about the “what-might-be’s” either; I think it’s more important to consider the “what-is”. But in fact, if we concentrate on the “what-is”, we can more easily ponder the “what-if” (our potential) and, importantly, more decisively define “what-will-be” (our future).
In order to understand what the prohibition of marijuana and hemp has led to, and in order to understand the beautiful potential of this suppressed plant, I think it’s important for supporters of marijuana and hemp prohibition (and even supporters of its legalization) to understand the “what-if’s” of legalization — by asking the question ‘What if marijuana and hemp had never been prohibited?’