THERE WAS NO INVESTIGATION, ONLY A COVER-UP FROM THE VERY FIRST DAY.
“Judge” Anna Pauffley listened to the “very lengthy audio recording” made by Special constable Jean Clement Yaohirou. This recording was the very first disclosure to the police reporting the rapes and murders at Hampstead Christ Church primary school and church, 5.9.14. ANYONE listening to this recording immediately realises the seriousness of the allegations and that this is NOT a custody dispute, OR a matter for a “Family Court”: it is the report of rape, torture and murder of children. Starting at around 1hr 25mins on the recording, the children begin to describe a black wart, “about the size of a five pence piece” on the vaginal “lips” of school nurse, Ms Marden. They go on to describe a “devil” tattoo Marden has on her pudendum, where her wart looks as if it is on the “devil’s cheek”. Both alisa and gabriel state clearly that all the teachers have these genital tattoos, as do the parents and children taking part in the “fun, sex parties”.
Hampstead Cover Up. The concealed evidence - Jean Clement's recording
This “TATTOO” testimony is highly-incriminating IDENTIFYING evidence, yet Pauffley in her so-called “judgement” (19-3-15) does NOT mention one word about these tattoos, or any of the genital markings such as piercings, birthmarks or warts the children had described on their NAMED attackers. “Judge” Pauffley KNEW the police had concealed this damning recording the same day they received it, and that it never formed part of their so-called investigation. Pauffley KNEW the concealment of this evidence by the police was a criminal act: FRAUD. “Judge” Anna Pauffley also KNEW, by being aware of this FACT, yet continuing with her Family Court “fact-finding hearing” - instead of halting it the moment she realised there had been no investigation of the tattoos/genital marks - that she too was committing FRAUD. This recording and its FRAUDULENT concealment of its important and highly-incriminating identifying testimony/evidence, proves that DI John Cannon 189067, DS Matthew Fernandez 205219, DC Steve Martin 219414, DC Alan Rogers 207875, DC Carl Savage (warrant number NOT recorded in police CRIS report) along with “Judge” Anna Pauffley and “Judge” Nigel Ryder, have ALL participated in FRAUD in order to cover-up the Hampstead Christ Church Child Rapes and Murders.
Hampstead Cover Up The Devil Tattoos & Agents Exposed
There was absolutely no need to drive Alisa and Gabriel around Hampstead & Highgate to try to identify Lewis Hollings’ house, or where their father, Ricky Dearman, was living. The need to identify premises where alleged crimes of sexual abuse/torture/murder have taken place arises when the identities/names of the alleged abusers/murderers and their addresses are NOT known. But alisa and gabriel had already given police the names of their father and Hampstead Christ Church school teachers Lewis Hollings and Katy Forsdyke, as well as many of the other teachers and parents at the school. In the UK, all primary school teachers - and ANYONE working with children - must be registered with the local authorities and their names/addresses are recorded on a police database. Many Hampstead primary school teachers would also be on the electoral register, along with most of the parents - and ALL their names and addresses would be on the school files. There would have been little difficulty in locating the addresses of the NAMED accused. It’s clear from the police CRIS report that the police had more than one of Dearman’s addresses, and his whereabouts could simply have been ascertained either from his mobile, using GPS and/or identifying his car. alisa described, in great detail, the INTERIOR of Lewis Hollings’ house, in particular the hidden cellar, where she and her brother were raped and tortured by Dearman, Hollings, Forsdyke, other teachers and parents, as well as being rented out to ANYONE paying “£50 ” a time (as alisa told DC Martin in her first police interview, 5.9.14). No onus whatsoever should have been put on the children to identify a house from the street. The onus was squarely on the police TO DO THEIR JOB and to SEARCH INSIDE Hollings’ house at his KNOWN address, and to search INSIDE Hampstead Christ Church school and church - the MAIN venues for the rape, torture and murder - as soon as possible. The onus was on the police to take the children’s allegations SERIOUSLY and to investigate them PROPERLY - AND IT STILL IS. Presumably, the school/church’s address was also known to the police, so to be consistent, why didn’t they drive the children round to positively identify these as well? But perhaps it was just too difficult to find another primary school and adjacent church which looked similar enough to confuse the children into making a false identification? It is perfectly clear the police “drive round”, 8.9.14, was a cover for NOT going to the school, or the church - and there was never any intention of “finding” Lewis Hollings’ house, or the father’s place either. The police were simply giving the well-connected and PROTECTED rapists/murderers time to clear away incriminating evidence, whilst confusing an eight and nine-year-old by driving them round unfamiliar streets. No search was ever made of the school, or any of the teachers’ homes, and none of the genitally-identified accused was ever questioned. No computers or mobiles phones of the accused were seized - or even checked - despite THE FACT gabriel told DC Steve Martin in his second police interview, 11.9.14: “my dad has, like, pictures of me naked, and doing sex to me when I was one years old - on his computer”.
From Gabriel's Police Interview on 9.11.2014:
G: She remembers. She got really good memory. Really good. gabriel is referring to his sister, alisa
S: Has she? OK, well I’ll ask her about that.
G: She’s got a really good …
S: When do you remember from?
G: I remember when I was one year old too.
S: You can remember when you were one year old. WOW
G: Yeah. And I’ve also seen picture.
S: A picture? What picture? Yes indeed, “what picture” DETECTIVE Steve Martin?
G: Like, erm, my dad has, like, pictures of me naked. And doing sex to me when I was one years old.
S: OK Yes, DC Martin. Dearman has pictures “doing sex” to his son…
G: On his computer. He has, like, a photograph, like. He keeps them. The photographs …ON HIS COMPUTER!
S: OK. So, you are all in this toilet then how does it started. Who’s done the sex to you?
G: My dad. The teachers. The parents. Perhaps there are pictures on computers of this too, Detective?
S: All of them? What do you think about checking the mobile phones/computers of the accused rapists and murderers, Detective Steve Martin?
S: And what have they done?
G: They stick the plastic willies in my bottom. They lick our privates.
S: How’s it started? That’s what I don’t understand. So, you’ve got in there, what’s happened first.
G: They touch us, then they do sex to us.
S: Who’s they? Who did it? NOTE: The police never checked the computers or mobile phones of ANY of the accused & only “interviewed” the father.
G: My dad. The teachers. And, all the parents
S: They’ve touched you. What does that mean?
Q: They touch our privates.
S: What do they do by touching you. What do they do?
Gabriel Police Interview 9.11.2014 (Part 1)
Gabriel Police Interview 9.11.2014 (Part 2)
Gabriel Police Interview 9.11.2014 (Part 3)
Gabriel Police Interview 9.11.2014 (Part 4)
It was only AFTER the children were snatched by police/Social Services, 11.9.14, that DC Steve Martin and DS Matt Fernandez ALLEGEDLY looked around the church. “Judge” Pauffley FALSELY states in her sham judgement that this occurred 10.9.14; the police CRIS report states it was 13.9.14 - but since Anna Pauffley, DC Martin and DS Fernandez are ALL PROVEN LIARS, even the claim police checked the church cannot be taken seriously.
The Hampstead Cover-up - Judge Pauffley's Lies
The following exchange between Mr Justin Ageros (representing the children's "guardian”) and Detective Constable Steve Martin 219414 from Barnet Police Station, is from DC Martin's testimony, 19th February 2015, at the "fact-finding" hearing presided over by "judge" Anna Pauffley. DC Martin conducted all three of the Achieving Best Evidence (ABE) police interviews with alisa and gabriel.
Mr Ageros: The children cited particular sexual descriptions of the teachers involved. Did you find any evidence that would lead you to a situation where you might have wanted to follow up these allegations?
DC Martin: The children, the video interviews of the children described, although in general were similar, the detail was wildly different, wildly different and, to the point where it was so obvious it hadn’t happened you wouldn’t go any further.
< This statement alone PROVES DC Martin's DERELICTION OF DUTY and GROSS MISCONDUCT
When asked about the children’s “sexual descriptions of the teachers involved”, DC Martin talks about “video interviews of the children”. NOTE: Mr Ageros did NOT say anything about “video interviews”. The ONLY video interviews containing “sexual descriptions of the teachers involved”, are the genital “distinguishing marks” and “TATTOOS” video recordings, which were “seized” by DC Alan Rogers on day one of the investigation, and then consigned to an unidentified location by DI John Cannon. According to “Judge” Anna Pauffley (in paragraph 107. of her judgement, 19-3-15) “no police officer had listened to the audio recording made by Jean Clement Yaohirou or watched the film clips of the children” as they had been sent “to a property store in Chingford.” So, OFFICIALLY, “no officers” had viewed these videos. However, it is EVIDENT from his reply to Mr Ageros that DC Martin HAD SEEN them, claiming the children’s descriptions were “in general… similar” but “the actual detail was wildly different”. However, ONLY gabriel gives testimony in these particular videos, graphically describing distinguishing marks such as pierce-rings, birthmarks and DEVIL/MONSTER TATTOOS on the genitals of named teachers and parents. So what is DC Martin comparing gabriel’s detailed descriptions to? DC Martin made NO entry in the police CRIS report about video interviews containing “sexual descriptions” of the teachers. Why? Because testimony/evidence of children describing particular genital marks on people they have NAMED as raping them, is highly incriminating: when combined with a positive medical examination confirming their existence on the genitals of the accused, it PROVES BEYOND ALL DOUBT the veracity of alisa’s and gabriel’s assertions of rape. The police, judiciary and anyone with a modicum of common sense, knows this. DC Martin and his criminal colleagues realised the need to conceal those damning “distinguishing marks/tattoos” recordings if they were to successfully effect a cover-up. alisa and gabriel told the truth about the unspeakable crimes they have been subjected to by these fiends, exposing these criminals and how and where they operate.
HIGH COURT JUDGE SPEAKS ABOUT HAMPSTEAD
Haze makes the following points about Judge Pauffley's judgement on the Hampstead child abuse case:
No feedback yet
Form is loading...